Translate

Friday 17 January 2014

The Ideal

If a country or communities stopped piracy, they will automatically position themselves in supportive mode/tune/formation. (because they would spend their time and resources to improve their internal sources of solutions, and connect to other communities through investment not through piracy)
Then so the community would be at the right path of progress of their civilization.
The improving of the level of availability of mutual solutions.

Friday 10 May 2013

Respect as a form of reward

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of MUTUAL solutions.
We reward authors of solutions with intellectual property rights.
This is in a way could be practical, because if we were to give money or acknowledgements to all of the sources of solutions that we enjoy, it would take tons of money for each individuals.
Therefore, because they've made the world friendlier for us, we also would make the world friendlier for them, by respecting their terms and conditions, and the law that maintains their properties and the mutuality that we enjoy.

Therefore I say that poor people who are not hostile but keep on inspiring, keep on being friendly to others, even though they don't have a job or like that, are those who are working.
The same way we respect our sources of solutions, making their world friendlier, give them intellectual property rights, obey their terms, etc... the same way these poor people are rewarding us by being friendly, lawful, and inspiring.

So these poor people are also my sources of solutions.
We don't have to pay with money all the time to make other people's world friendlier, we respect the law, we respect their interests, that's a form of payment too.

Jesus bless

Tuesday 7 May 2013

Melki's ultimate realization

My thoughts are nothing or dangerous, rubbish without God's word... it should not be separated from God's words. Hereby I say, all of my thoughts are not to be understood independent from God's word.
God's words are the truth, and superior over all. Jesus is my Lord, the Lord of all.

Saturday 22 September 2012

Kenapa Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual begitu repot?

Pertama tama, menurut saya, logika dibalik hukum kekayaan intelektual adalah kebebasan dan harga diri buat mereka yang menghasilkan solusi.
Solusi adalah kekayaan dunia, uang boleh banyak tapi kalau tidak ada solusi itu semua tidak berguna.

Oleh sebab itu, para pembuat solusi harus dihargai seperti para pedagang atau pabrik pembuat barang.
Bayangkan, masa penjual sapi bisa menolak kalau harganya ditawar terlalu murah tapi musisi, ilmuan, dan programmer tidak bisa?
Masak mereka tidak bisa bilang "eh, jangan, jangan konsumsi atau gunakan produkku tanpa izinku... bayar dulu lah peng yo?"

Inilah logika dari HAKI, yaitu kemampuan untuk menolak, atau harga diri. Dan hal inilah yang membuat sulit orang mengabolisi hukum HAKI.
Secara pribadi saya punya solusinya, tapi sebaiknya dipraktekkan rame-rame, yaitu mem-post bukti pembayaran atau struk pembayaran di profile page. Orang-orang yang tidak punya struk berarti belum bayar, dan kalau mereka menggunakan banyak hasil kekayaan intelektual, berarti mereka kurang etis, atau beresiko tinggi diajak berbisnis. (nota bisa digantikan stiker, stiker perunggu untuk yang murah, stiker emas atau platinum untuk yang mahal, tapi harus asli bertanda-tangan digital dsb).

Tapi kembali lagi kepada topik, sapi kan terbatas, tapi musik bisa dikopi terus? Kenapa masih pake HAKI juga? Jawabannya tetap saja, semua solusi itu berharga, yang membawanya ke alam kita harus diperlakukan dengan baik. Pemerintah memperlakukan mereka dengan baik, dengan cara memberi mereka hak seperti itu.
Kenapa ratusan tahun yang lalu kecepatan perkembangan teknologi begitu lambat, sedangkan seratus tahun terakhir begitu cepat? Apakah karena Inggris mencetuskan konsep paten / haki?
Berpartisipasilah, berterima kasihlah kepada sumber solusi, seperti memelihara hutan dan laut, semua sumber solusi harus dipelihara.

Ada tanggapan?

Tuesday 29 May 2012

Indonesia Reciprocating Foundation

This is just my imaginary foundation, where people pay to companies or authors that have created products that have been used and/or are being useful to the lives of the people. Some of these people could be those who think the benefits contributed by these services have exceeded expectations and consider these authors deserve more help than what previously have been paid to them.
People could give like 5000, 10,000, 20,000 rupiahs at a time. When the amounts became significant enough, these would be sent to the respective companies. Like Ubuntu, other Open source authors, Proprietary companies etc.
---------------------------------------

Gerakan indonesia mau berterimakasih

Ini adalah organisasi yayasan khayalan saya, dimana organisasi ini mengumpulkan uang
dari para pengguna produk-produk dan kemudian uangnya dikirim kepada produsen yang bersangkutan.
Produsen-produsen yang akan diberikan uang kira-kira:
- Microsoft
- Ubuntu
- Adobe
- Para programmer open source lainnya
- Universal studio and music
- Pixar
- Konami
- Bandai
- Squaresoft
- MPEG-LA
- Norton
- Nero
- Unilever
- Perusahaan pharmacy yang obatnya dicopy
- Dll.
Kenapa dibutuhkan yayasan? Karena setiap orang mungkin cuma kontribusi,
5000, 10000 rupiah, agar bisa cukup signifikan harus dikumpul semua baru kemudian
dibuatkan proposal langsung kepada perusahaan-perusahaan untuk menerima pemberian tersebut.

Mereka yang menyumbang dapat juga terdiri dari orang-orang yang menganggap bahwa pertolongan yang telah disediakan oleh para author/sumber ini melebihi harapan, dan dianggap pantas untuk mendapatkan lebih banyak pertolongan lagi daripada jumlah yang telah dibayarkan sebelumnya.

Wednesday 16 May 2012

Intellectual Property Law and Maintaining Mutual Solutions v.02

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy but of mutual solutions.
I believe so, and that's why I support the culture of giving back to the sources of solutions. Including authors of softwares, musics, and movies.
And now I have another peace with the idea of Intellectual Property.

When comes to solutions we must talk about 2 other things:
1. Who or What is the source of the solutions
2. How to maintain the level of availability of the solutions
3. How to keep on having relevant solutions available

Intellectual property wants to maintain the level of availability of mutual solutions in reality, not only it encourages payment to sources of solutions, but also it accomodates the source of the solutions to dictate how the solutions were used. In my view this serve the purpose of maintaining the solutions.

So the payment and the licenses we adhere to is not only for the sake of giving thanks to the source of solutions, but also direct action in maintaining the level of availability of the solutions.
In short, we pay to the source, as well as the maintainer.

Therefore I propose a system that might be used in alternative to Intellectual property. Besides the Golden Sticker, http://melkieh.blogspot.com/2011/09/golden-sticker.html
http://melkieh.blogspot.com/2011/11/golden-sticker-continued.html
there should also be an account for the maintainers of the solutions.
Intellectual property law doesn't separate these two, I think it will be useful to separate these accounts.

Therefore everytime one is putting himself outthere, people would look at his/her profile and see whether or not this guy have paid to the sources of solutions and the maintainers of the solutions.
If it shows that the person doesn't prioritizing on giving thanks and maintaining mutual solutions, people would prioritize him/her less in business. Naturally this is only appropriate because the scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions.